Argumentative Transformed Score

Question: Discuss about theArgumentative for Transformed Score. Answer: Introduction The essay aims to highlight the paradigm shift in the sphere of primary school level education (PSLE) in Singapore. Initially, the schools of Singapore used to emphasize the Transformed Score (TS) at the primary school level. The Transformed Score means standardization of raw scores and rank students comparative to others. The practice spawns baleful competition among the students of Singapore (TENG, 2016). The essay assumes an argumentative stance drawing on issues (moral, ethical, social and others) encompassing the PSLE grading system of T-Score. The moral ground of the T-Score (PSLE Grading System) entails maintenance of rigor and control among the students of Singapore. The T-Score involves both positive and negative factors. The positive factor is it kindles a spirit of competition among the students of all schools at the primary level. However, the unhealthy competition takes a heavy toll on the students. The students have to cope with the burdensome syllabus that exerts unnecessary pressure on them (TENG, 2016). The ethical issue states that the T-Score pattern makes the students flexible and encourages them to inculcate strong work ethic. The parents prepare their students to pass the huddle with ease. However, the pattern reveals conflicting interests among the students and forces them to do rot learning (YANG, 2016). The social issue explains that the government of Singapore wants to ensconce elitism and class differentiation within the matrix of PSLE (Ngerng, 2016). The T-Score pattern is such that the students get ranks relative to others. It creates an unnecessary clamor for the test marks that determines the quality of the students. Therefore, test marks act as the yardstick for the quality and improvement of the students. Hence, this kind of marking engenders ruckus at the primary school level. The T-Score of the PSLE focuses on class divergence and not on the holistic development of the students. In this segment, the argument centers on the upholding of the T-Score of PSLE. According to Siong, the T-Score of PSLE is an old system that instills enthusiasm in pupils to study more actively. It helps the students to comprehend the graveness of the matter and encourage them to fight for the first position. To his belief, this kind of grading system acts as a motivating factor for the students who want to leap to the bandwagon of success (Siong, 2013). At the same time, pupils take this as an opportunity to exhibit their profundity of knowledge. Over the past several years, there has been a heated controversy regarding the T-Score of PSLE education system. The grading system, albeit rigorous, but it greatly influences the pupils to plod through the mountain of books and comes out with satisfactory results. Therefore, such marking pattern is good, in a sense; it keeps a track on the performance and the capability of students. Many students find this pattern interesting and quixotic. It helps them to beat the opposing forces and climb the ladder of success. From the very beginning, the students understand the tactics and they apply it in all spheres of their life. Coming to the counter-argumentative stance, the T-Score of the PSLE has been criticized from all quarters. The system creates a ruckus in the field of primary education. The pupils have to endure the worst of the system in the initial years of their schooling (THAM, 2016). The students have to bear the travail of the syllabus during their early schooling. According to Yang, the parents are piqued by the essence of the grading system. They gear up their children for the examination. The system exerts heavy pressure on the fledgling students. The students and their parents remain fearful of the higher stakes and admission to new schools. The parents want their students to perform relatively better (YANG, 2016). The earlier system forces the students to browse through the books and mug up the texts impatiently. However, the new system gives the students an opportunity to engage in enthralling discourse. The new education system weighs over the complete development of students. It helps the students to discover their concealed talents and treasure trove of knowledge. Here, I feel that the government of Singapore strives for the better development of students. The earlier system, to my idea, has a detrimental effect on the students of Singapore, who are at their primary level. I understand that the schools want to bring the best out of their students. They aim to uplift the standard of their institutions along with the betterment of students. Under the existing system, the students are losing the best times of their childhood and always remain in haste. For an instance, the current T-Score system draws a fine discrimination line. A student who possesses a T-Score Average of 231 and a student who gets 230 are equally ready for the secondary school. Therefore, it is erroneous to arrive at such a discriminatory conclusion at this tender age (www.todayonline.com, 2016). The T-score is rep laced by the new grading system, which gives students scope to delve into the new discoveries. According to the sources, the new system has so much to offer and reduces the differentiation mark that exhorts the pupils to be good players. In the debate, the essay supports the counter-argumentative position. It does not accord the T-Score of the PSLE system. The earlier T-Score wields pressure on the tiny tots and makes them subservient to the system of manifesting their knowledge. In the real sense, the students are studying for the sake of scoring high marks and not for true learning (SIN, 2016). The students have nothing to explore or experiment during their schooling days. The main intention of penning down the essay is to make the citizens of Singapore aware of the grave T-Score pattern. The current marking system has a perilous effect on the students. In the hope of scoring higher grades, the students fall victim to serious illness. Therefore, it is high time that the government shuns the existing pattern and welcomes the Achievement Level (AL) grading system in Singapore. Reference 10 things to know about changes to the PSLE scoring system. (2016). TODAYonline. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/10-things-know-about-changes-psle-scoring-system Ngerng, R. (2016). New PSLE Education System: Taking a Deeper Look at the Numbers. The Heart Truths. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://thehearttruths.com/2016/07/16/new-psle-education-system-taking-a-deeper-look-at-the-numbers SIN, Y. (2016). PSLE changes: Parents worry kids' weaker subjects will pull down results. The Straits Times. Retrieved 24 September 2016, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/parents-worry-kids-weaker-subjects-will-pull-down-results Siong, L. G. (2013). PSLE in Singapore: Primary School Leaving Examinations or Politics, Society, Legislation, and Education. TENG, A. (2016). PSLE through the years. The Straits Times. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/psle-through-the-years THAM, I. (2016). PSLE changes won't change Singapore's obsession with grades. The Straits Times. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/psle-changes-wont-change-singapores-obsession-with-grades YANG, C. (2016). Preparing for exams: 'Like the whole family is sitting the PSLE'. The Straits Times. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/like-the-whole-family-is-sitting-the-psle